Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of Verne’s competitors in the Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing category are Apache Kafka with 38.82%, RabbitMQ with 29.47%, IBM MQ with 7.28% market share.
Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
---|---|---|---|
Apache Kafka | 26606 | 38.82% | Verne vs Apache Kafka |
RabbitMQ | 20194 | 29.47% | Verne vs RabbitMQ |
IBM MQ | 4991 | 7.28% | Verne vs IBM MQ |
Apache ActiveMQ | 4305 | 6.28% | Verne vs Apache ActiveMQ |
Microsoft Azure Service Bus | 2724 | 3.97% | Verne vs Microsoft Azure Service Bus |
Realtime Framework | 2539 | 3.71% | Verne vs Realtime Framework |
Google Cloud Messaging | 1652 | 2.41% | Verne vs Google Cloud Messaging |
Ably Realtime | 1294 | 1.89% | Verne vs Ably Realtime |
ZeroMQ | 1208 | 1.76% | Verne vs ZeroMQ |
NServiceBus | 932 | 1.36% | Verne vs NServiceBus |
Gearman | 520 | 0.76% | Verne vs Gearman |
NSQ | 383 | 0.56% | Verne vs NSQ |
Hornetq | 324 | 0.47% | Verne vs Hornetq |
Amazon Simple Workflow Service (SWF) | 312 | 0.46% | Verne vs Amazon Simple Workflow Service (SWF) |
Eclipse Paho | 160 | 0.23% | Verne vs Eclipse Paho |
CloudAMQP | 90 | 0.13% | Verne vs CloudAMQP |
Apache Qpid | 87 | 0.13% | Verne vs Apache Qpid |
NATS | 76 | 0.11% | Verne vs NATS |
Iron.io | 36 | 0.05% | Verne vs Iron.io |
CloudMQTT | 33 | 0.05% | Verne vs CloudMQTT |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of Verne’s competitors in the Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing category are Apache Kafka with 38.82%, RabbitMQ with 29.47%, IBM MQ with 7.28% market share.
Verne vs Apache Kafka
Verne vs RabbitMQ
Verne vs IBM MQ
Verne vs Apache ActiveMQ
Verne vs Microsoft Azure Service Bus
Verne vs Realtime Framework
Verne vs Google Cloud Messaging
Verne vs Ably Realtime
Around the world in 2024, over 4 companies have started using Verne as Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing tool.
Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Silpion IT-Solutions GmbH | 100 - 249 | Hamburg | Hamburg | Germany | |
Mqtt | 20 - 49 | Ranst | Flanders | Belgium | |
Capitalware Inc. | 0 - 9 | Markham | Ontario | Canada | |
Evothings | 0 - 9 | Stockholm | Stockholm | Sweden |
The top three products and services offering customers that use Verne for Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing are Connected Things (1), E-Commerce (1), Devops Process Engineering (1).
Customers
The majority of Verne's customers for the queueing-messaging-and-background-processing category fall in the company size of 0 - 9 employees (2 companies), 20 - 49 employees (1 companies), 100 - 249 employees (1 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of Verne for queueing-messaging-and-background-processing are the Belgium with 1(25.00%), Sweden with 1(25.00%), Canada with 1(25.00%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top Verne competitors?
Verne’s Top competitors in the queueing-messaging-and-background-processing category are Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ, IBM MQ. You can view a full list of Verne competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of Verne and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare Verne and its feature with top competitors here : Verne vs Apache Kafka Verne vs RabbitMQ Verne vs IBM MQ.
What is Verne customer distribution based on company size?
What is Verne market share in the queueing-messaging-and-background-processing?
What are the top countries that use Verne?
What are the top industries that use Verne?
Justine Lyon
Senior VP of Sales, Ally
At my previous organization we used Zoominfo and LInkedIn Navigator for contact, Bombora for intent and DiscoverOrg for account info. When I joined Ally where we use 6sense, I found it to be as valuable as all the other tools combined!
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo