image

Iron.io

thumbs_up

thumbs_down

Iron.io offers scalable cloud-based message queue and processing platforms for building distributed cloud applications.

Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing
icon

Market Share of Iron.io

Current Customer(s)

61

Market Share (Est.)

0.05%

Ranking

#19

Top Competitors and Alternatives of Iron.io

The top three of Iron.io’s competitors in the Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing category are Apache Kafka with 39.30%, RabbitMQ with 29.79%, Apache ActiveMQ with 5.97% market share.

TechnologyDomainsMarket Share (Est.)Versus page
Apache Kafka4798239.30%Iron.io vs Apache Kafka
RabbitMQ3637729.79%Iron.io vs RabbitMQ
Apache ActiveMQ72875.97%Iron.io vs Apache ActiveMQ
IBM MQ71415.85%Iron.io vs IBM MQ
Microsoft Azure Service Bus65625.37%Iron.io vs Microsoft Azure Service Bus
Google Cloud Messaging63265.18%Iron.io vs Google Cloud Messaging
Realtime Framework37963.11%Iron.io vs Realtime Framework
ZeroMQ17411.43%Iron.io vs ZeroMQ
NServiceBus13001.06%Iron.io vs NServiceBus
Ably Realtime9230.76%Iron.io vs Ably Realtime
Amazon Simple Workflow Service (SWF)6430.53%Iron.io vs Amazon Simple Workflow Service (SWF)
Gearman6260.51%Iron.io vs Gearman
Hornetq4620.38%Iron.io vs Hornetq
NATS2570.21%Iron.io vs NATS
Eclipse Paho2440.20%Iron.io vs Eclipse Paho
CloudAMQP1090.09%Iron.io vs CloudAMQP
Apache Qpid1070.09%Iron.io vs Apache Qpid
NSQ860.07%Iron.io vs NSQ
CloudMQTT200.02%Iron.io vs CloudMQTT
Sidekiq Pro130.01%Iron.io vs Sidekiq Pro
image

Popular Comparisons

Top Competitors and Alternatives of Iron.io

The top three of Iron.io’s competitors in the Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing category are Apache Kafka with 39.30%, RabbitMQ with 29.79%, Apache ActiveMQ with 5.97% market share.

Iron.io vs Apache Kafka

arrow_icon

Iron.io vs RabbitMQ

arrow_icon

Iron.io vs Apache ActiveMQ

arrow_icon

Iron.io vs IBM MQ

arrow_icon

Iron.io vs Microsoft Azure Service Bus

arrow_icon

Iron.io vs Google Cloud Messaging

arrow_icon

Iron.io vs Realtime Framework

arrow_icon

Iron.io vs ZeroMQ

arrow_icon

Customers of Iron.io

Around the world in 2026, over 61 companies have started using Iron.io as Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing tool.

CustomersEmployee RangeCityRegionCountrySocial Links
Siemens10,000+MunichBavariaGermany
social_iconsocial_iconsocial_iconsocial_icon
Oracle Corporation10,000+AustinTexasUnited States
social_iconsocial_iconsocial_iconsocial_icon
CNN10,000+New York CityNew YorkUnited States
social_iconsocial_iconsocial_iconsocial_icon
SoftServe10,000+AustinTexasUnited States
social_iconsocial_iconsocial_iconsocial_icon
Google10,000+Mountain ViewCaliforniaUnited States
social_iconsocial_iconsocial_iconsocial_icon
Whole Foods Market10,000+AustinTexasUnited States
social_iconsocial_iconsocial_iconsocial_icon
Philips10,000+AmsterdamNorth HollandNetherlands
social_iconsocial_iconsocial_iconsocial_icon
Atrius10,000+OaklandCaliforniaUnited States
social_iconsocial_iconsocial_iconsocial_icon
Fanatics Events10,000+JacksonvilleFloridaUnited States
social_iconsocial_iconsocial_iconsocial_icon
GitHub5,000 - 9,999San FranciscoCaliforniaUnited States
social_iconsocial_iconsocial_iconsocial_icon

Uncover hidden demand and identify accounts ready to buy with 6sense Intent Data.

Get a demoKnow More
Company Logo

Iron.io Customers by Products and Services

The top three products and services offering customers that use Iron.io for Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing are Marketing (3), Software Development (3), Saas (3).

Customers

Download the 6sense Chrome Extension to get verified contact data of Iron.io employees

Install Now
Company Logo

Iron.io Customers by Employee Size

The majority of Iron.io's customers for the queueing-messaging-and-background-processing category fall in the company size of 10,000+ employees (12 companies), 20 - 49 employees (12 companies), 100 - 249 employees (11 companies).

Employee Size

Iron.io Customers by Geography

The top three geographies of Iron.io for queueing-messaging-and-background-processing are the United States with 44(73.33%), Australia with 3(5.00%), Japan with 2(3.33%) customers respectively.

Customers

Employees of Iron.io

image

Also see other Products/Services by Iron.io in:

Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing

FAQ

Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.

Who are the top Iron.io competitors?

Iron.io’s Top competitors in the queueing-messaging-and-background-processing category are Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ, Apache ActiveMQ. You can view a full list of Iron.io competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of Iron.io and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare Iron.io and its feature with top competitors here : Iron.io vs Apache Kafka Iron.io vs RabbitMQ Iron.io vs Apache ActiveMQ.

faq icon

What is Iron.io customer distribution based on company size?

faq icon

What is Iron.io market share in the queueing-messaging-and-background-processing?

faq icon

What are the top countries that use Iron.io?

faq icon

What are the top industries that use Iron.io?

faq icon

Get everything in one place

Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.

Get a demo

Interested in 6sense for your organization?

Book a Demo
6sense Logo
social iconssocial iconssocial iconssocial icons
MarketingAccount IdentificationIntent DataData Enrichment & ManagementPredictive AnalyticsOrchestrations & WorkflowsAudience BuildingAdvertisingConversational EmailPipeline IntelligenceIntegrations
SolutionsBusiness ServicesFinancial ServicesTransportation & LogisticsManufacturingTechnologyCustomersMeet Our CustomersCustomer StoriesCustomer ReviewsRevCityKnowledge Base

Company

AboutLeadership TeamCareersNewsroomCommunity

Browse 6sense Data

TechnographicsComparing TechnologiesCompany SearchPeople Search
TermsPrivacy PolicyPrivacy CenterDo Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

© 2026 6sense