Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of Q>TAR’s competitors in the Leave Management category are Frontline Education with 41.31%, Attendance on Demand with 25.32%, Peoplenet with 7.21% market share.
Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
---|---|---|---|
Frontline Education | 3812 | 41.31% | Q>TAR vs Frontline Education |
Attendance on Demand | 2336 | 25.32% | Q>TAR vs Attendance on Demand |
Peoplenet | 665 | 7.21% | Q>TAR vs Peoplenet |
PayrollHero | 330 | 3.58% | Q>TAR vs PayrollHero |
NOVAtime | 318 | 3.45% | Q>TAR vs NOVAtime |
LeaveLogic | 284 | 3.08% | Q>TAR vs LeaveLogic |
Mitrefinch | 177 | 1.92% | Q>TAR vs Mitrefinch |
TimeClock Plus | 121 | 1.31% | Q>TAR vs TimeClock Plus |
PeoplesHR | 107 | 1.16% | Q>TAR vs PeoplesHR |
TimeTrex | 72 | 0.78% | Q>TAR vs TimeTrex |
HR Studio | 71 | 0.77% | Q>TAR vs HR Studio |
CertiPay | 64 | 0.69% | Q>TAR vs CertiPay |
Vacation Tracker | 64 | 0.69% | Q>TAR vs Vacation Tracker |
Presagia | 61 | 0.66% | Q>TAR vs Presagia |
nettime | 54 | 0.59% | Q>TAR vs nettime |
ezClocker | 44 | 0.48% | Q>TAR vs ezClocker |
Advance Systems Inc. | 36 | 0.39% | Q>TAR vs Advance Systems Inc. |
TimeStation | 35 | 0.38% | Q>TAR vs TimeStation |
PayrollPanda | 30 | 0.33% | Q>TAR vs PayrollPanda |
Timelive | 27 | 0.29% | Q>TAR vs Timelive |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of Q>TAR’s competitors in the Leave Management category are Frontline Education with 41.31%, Attendance on Demand with 25.32%, Peoplenet with 7.21% market share.
Q>TAR vs Frontline Education
Q>TAR vs Attendance on Demand
Q>TAR vs Peoplenet
Q>TAR vs PayrollHero
Q>TAR vs NOVAtime
Q>TAR vs LeaveLogic
Q>TAR vs Mitrefinch
Q>TAR vs TimeClock Plus
Around the world in 2024, over 6 companies have started using Q>TAR as Leave Management tool.
Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Admiral Lehigh Resort Limited Partnership | 50 - 99 | Lehigh Acres | Florida | United States | |
ASHBROOK RESEARCH LIMITED | 10 - 19 | Rugeley | England | United Kingdom | |
NameBounce | 0 - 9 | Walnut | California | United States | |
P&Q | 0 - 9 | London | England | United Kingdom | |
Denver Jaycees | 0 - 9 | Saint Paul | Minnesota | United States | |
Mags Uk | Monmouth | Wales | United Kingdom |
The top three products and services offering customers that use Q>TAR for Leave Management are Data Capture Solutions (Aidc Sfdc (1), Rfid Barcode) (1), Integrated Solutions (1).
Customers
The majority of Q>TAR's customers for the leave-management category fall in the company size of 0 - 9 employees (3 companies), 10 - 19 employees (1 companies), 50 - 99 employees (1 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of Q>TAR for leave-management are the United Kingdom with 3(50.00%), United States with 3(50.00%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top Q>TAR competitors?
Q>TAR’s Top competitors in the leave-management category are Frontline Education, Attendance on Demand, Peoplenet. You can view a full list of Q>TAR competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of Q>TAR and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare Q>TAR and its feature with top competitors here : Q>TAR vs Frontline Education Q>TAR vs Attendance on Demand Q>TAR vs Peoplenet.
What is Q>TAR customer distribution based on company size?
What is Q>TAR market share in the leave-management?
What are the top countries that use Q>TAR?
What are the top industries that use Q>TAR?
Justine Lyon
Senior VP of Sales, Ally
At my previous organization we used Zoominfo and LInkedIn Navigator for contact, Bombora for intent and DiscoverOrg for account info. When I joined Ally where we use 6sense, I found it to be as valuable as all the other tools combined!
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo