Kato enables teams to communicate faster and more efficiently, reduces email overload and provides easy access to organizational knowledge.
Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of Kato’s competitors in the Instant Messaging category are Telegram with 44.30%, Flock with 24.69%, Kakao Talk with 6.62% market share.
Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
---|---|---|---|
Telegram | 43262 | 44.30% | Kato vs Telegram |
Flock | 24114 | 24.69% | Kato vs Flock |
Kakao Talk | 6464 | 6.62% | Kato vs Kakao Talk |
Chatra | 6052 | 6.20% | Kato vs Chatra |
Skype for Business | 3321 | 3.40% | Kato vs Skype for Business |
Jabber | 2251 | 2.31% | Kato vs Jabber |
Cisco Jabber | 2157 | 2.21% | Kato vs Cisco Jabber |
Messenger | 1635 | 1.67% | Kato vs Messenger |
Google Cloud Pub/Sub | 1483 | 1.52% | Kato vs Google Cloud Pub/Sub |
GroupMe | 1304 | 1.34% | Kato vs GroupMe |
Gitter | 1247 | 1.28% | Kato vs Gitter |
Symphony | 645 | 0.66% | Kato vs Symphony |
Riot | 549 | 0.56% | Kato vs Riot |
Mattermost | 366 | 0.37% | Kato vs Mattermost |
Full Measure | 336 | 0.34% | Kato vs Full Measure |
Skype for Business Server | 301 | 0.31% | Kato vs Skype for Business Server |
OX App Suite | 297 | 0.30% | Kato vs OX App Suite |
Pidgin | 297 | 0.30% | Kato vs Pidgin |
Lita | 197 | 0.20% | Kato vs Lita |
Cisco Spark | 194 | 0.20% | Kato vs Cisco Spark |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of Kato’s competitors in the Instant Messaging category are Telegram with 44.30%, Flock with 24.69%, Kakao Talk with 6.62% market share.
Kato vs Telegram
Kato vs Flock
Kato vs Kakao Talk
Kato vs Chatra
Kato vs Skype for Business
Kato vs Jabber
Kato vs Cisco Jabber
Kato vs Messenger
Around the world in 2024, over 20 companies have started using Kato as Instant Messaging tool.
Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Org | 50 - 99 | Chicago | Illinois | United States | |
SAASPASS | 20 - 49 | San Francisco | California | United States | |
Pogo Linux | 20 - 49 | Redmond | Washington | United States | |
Trademark Title Services, Inc. | 20 - 49 | Savage | Minnesota | United States | |
Sandglaz | 20 - 49 | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | |
Imould | 20 - 49 | Linhai | Zhejiang | People's Republic of China | |
Trademark Title Services | 20 - 49 | Denver | Colorado | United States | |
Lonelyseat.co.nz | 10 - 19 | Hamilton | Waikato | New Zealand | |
Imachika | 10 - 19 | Fukuoka | Fukuoka | Japan | |
Nurture | 10 - 19 | Wellington | Wellington | New Zealand |
The majority of Kato's customers for the instant-messaging category fall in the company size of 0 - 9 employees (10 companies), 20 - 49 employees (6 companies), 10 - 19 employees (3 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of Kato for instant-messaging are the United States with 10(50.00%), New Zealand with 5(25.00%), Spain with 2(10.00%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top Kato competitors?
Kato’s Top competitors in the instant-messaging category are Telegram, Flock, Kakao Talk. You can view a full list of Kato competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of Kato and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare Kato and its feature with top competitors here : Kato vs Telegram Kato vs Flock Kato vs Kakao Talk.
What is Kato customer distribution based on company size?
What is Kato market share in the instant-messaging?
What are the top countries that use Kato?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo