Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of Grav’s competitors in the Web Content Management category are Drupal with 37.81%, TYPO3 with 20.55%, Drupal 7 with 19.81% market share.
| Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drupal | 215798 | 37.81% | Grav vs Drupal |
| TYPO3 | 117306 | 20.55% | Grav vs TYPO3 |
| Drupal 7 | 113100 | 19.81% | Grav vs Drupal 7 |
| Adobe Portfolio | 21091 | 3.69% | Grav vs Adobe Portfolio |
| JSTOR | 18891 | 3.31% | Grav vs JSTOR |
| Umbraco | 18830 | 3.30% | Grav vs Umbraco |
| HubSpot Website Platform | 13538 | 2.37% | Grav vs HubSpot Website Platform |
| Google Feedburner | 10965 | 1.92% | Grav vs Google Feedburner |
| SilverStripe | 8988 | 1.57% | Grav vs SilverStripe |
| ProQuest | 4272 | 0.75% | Grav vs ProQuest |
| Xoops | 3799 | 0.67% | Grav vs Xoops |
| Progress Sitefinity | 3769 | 0.66% | Grav vs Progress Sitefinity |
| Plone | 3073 | 0.54% | Grav vs Plone |
| Microsoft Frontpage | 2750 | 0.48% | Grav vs Microsoft Frontpage |
| Contenido | 2075 | 0.36% | Grav vs Contenido |
| HubSpot CMS Hub | 1433 | 0.25% | Grav vs HubSpot CMS Hub |
| Craft CMS | 1266 | 0.22% | Grav vs Craft CMS |
| Drupal 9 | 1127 | 0.20% | Grav vs Drupal 9 |
| WebSphere Portal Server | 998 | 0.17% | Grav vs WebSphere Portal Server |
| ExpressionEngine | 959 | 0.17% | Grav vs ExpressionEngine |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of Grav’s competitors in the Web Content Management category are Drupal with 37.81%, TYPO3 with 20.55%, Drupal 7 with 19.81% market share.
Grav vs Drupal
Grav vs TYPO3
Grav vs Drupal 7
Grav vs Adobe Portfolio
Grav vs JSTOR
Grav vs Umbraco
Grav vs HubSpot Website Platform
Grav vs Google Feedburner
Around the world in 2026, over 594 companies have started using Grav as Web Content Management tool.
| Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abbott | 10,000+ | North Chicago | Illinois | United States | |
| RMIT School Of Education | 10,000+ | Bundoora | Victoria | Australia | |
| Aker Solutions | 10,000+ | Lysaker | Akershus | Norway | |
| DFDS | 10,000+ | Copenhagen | Capital Region | Denmark | |
| Havas | 10,000+ | New York City | New York | United States | |
| Goteborgs Stad | 10,000+ | Goeteborg | Vaestra Goetaland | Sweden | |
| Universidad De Jaén | 10,000+ | Jaen | Andalusia | Spain | |
| Sogeti | 10,000+ | Paris | Ile-de-France | France | |
| Grant Thornton | 10,000+ | Chicago | Illinois | United States | |
| Handelsbanken | 10,000+ | Stockholm | Stockholm | Sweden |
The top three products and services offering customers that use Grav for Web Content Management are Education (35), Urban Planning (31), Public Transportation (30).
Customers
The majority of Grav's customers for the web-content-management category fall in the company size of 0 - 9 employees (145 companies), 20 - 49 employees (107 companies), 10,000+ employees (88 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of Grav for web-content-management are the United States with 142(30.28%), Sweden with 114(24.31%), Denmark with 51(10.87%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top Grav competitors?
Grav’s Top competitors in the web-content-management category are Drupal, TYPO3, Drupal 7. You can view a full list of Grav competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of Grav and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare Grav and its feature with top competitors here : Grav vs Drupal Grav vs TYPO3 Grav vs Drupal 7.
What is Grav customer distribution based on company size?
What is Grav market share in the web-content-management?
What are the top countries that use Grav?
What are the top industries that use Grav?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo