XTRF is the management platform for translation agencies and corporate translation departments.
Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of XTRF’s competitors in the Translation And Localization category are WPML with 96.09%, Docusaurus with 1.70%, OneSky with 0.45% market share.
Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
---|---|---|---|
WPML | 226583 | 96.09% | XTRF vs WPML |
Docusaurus | 3998 | 1.70% | XTRF vs Docusaurus |
OneSky | 1067 | 0.45% | XTRF vs OneSky |
Bablic | 1000 | 0.42% | XTRF vs Bablic |
Memsource | 650 | 0.28% | XTRF vs Memsource |
Crowdin | 502 | 0.21% | XTRF vs Crowdin |
SDL Trados Studio | 360 | 0.15% | XTRF vs SDL Trados Studio |
Lokalise | 187 | 0.08% | XTRF vs Lokalise |
Plunet | 124 | 0.05% | XTRF vs Plunet |
Otter | 119 | 0.05% | XTRF vs Otter |
Interpreter Intelligence | 111 | 0.05% | XTRF vs Interpreter Intelligence |
Phrase | 96 | 0.04% | XTRF vs Phrase |
Systran | 87 | 0.04% | XTRF vs Systran |
memoQ | 86 | 0.04% | XTRF vs memoQ |
Unbabel | 61 | 0.03% | XTRF vs Unbabel |
Interprefy | 52 | 0.02% | XTRF vs Interprefy |
Localize.io | 43 | 0.02% | XTRF vs Localize.io |
Smartcat | 40 | 0.02% | XTRF vs Smartcat |
POEditor | 37 | 0.02% | XTRF vs POEditor |
WeLocalize | 36 | 0.02% | XTRF vs WeLocalize |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of XTRF’s competitors in the Translation And Localization category are WPML with 96.09%, Docusaurus with 1.70%, OneSky with 0.45% market share.
XTRF vs WPML
XTRF vs Docusaurus
XTRF vs OneSky
XTRF vs Bablic
XTRF vs Memsource
XTRF vs Crowdin
XTRF vs SDL Trados Studio
XTRF vs Lokalise
Around the world in 2025, over 98 companies have started using XTRF as Translation And Localization tool.
Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Olympus Corporation | 10,000+ | Tokyo | Tokyo | Japan | |
Allianz | 10,000+ | Munich | Bavaria | Germany | |
Queensland Law Society | 5,000 - 9,999 | Brisbane | Queensland | Australia | |
Transcom | 5,000 - 9,999 | Stockholm | Stockholm | Sweden | |
Etteplan | 5,000 - 9,999 | Espoo | Uusimaa | Finland | |
Wirtgen Group | 5,000 - 9,999 | Windhagen | Rheinland-Pfalz | Germany | |
LMI | 1,000 - 4,999 | McLean | Virginia | United States | |
World Food Programme | 1,000 - 4,999 | Rome | Latium | Italy | |
Oncall Language Services | 1,000 - 4,999 | South Melbourne | Victoria | Australia | |
UNIR | 1,000 - 4,999 | Logrono | La Rioja | Spain |
The top three products and services offering customers that use XTRF for Translation And Localization are Translation (28), Localization (20), Interpreting (14).
Customers
The majority of XTRF's customers for the translation-and-localization category fall in the company size of 20 - 49 employees (35 companies), 100 - 249 employees (14 companies), 250 - 499 employees (12 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of XTRF for translation-and-localization are the United States with 29(38.16%), United Kingdom with 10(13.16%), Spain with 10(13.16%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top XTRF competitors?
XTRF’s Top competitors in the translation-and-localization category are WPML, Docusaurus, OneSky. You can view a full list of XTRF competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of XTRF and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare XTRF and its feature with top competitors here : XTRF vs WPML XTRF vs Docusaurus XTRF vs OneSky.
What is XTRF customer distribution based on company size?
What is XTRF market share in the translation-and-localization?
What are the top countries that use XTRF?
What are the top industries that use XTRF?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo