XTRF is the management platform for translation agencies and corporate translation departments.
Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of XTRF’s competitors in the Translation And Localization category are WPML with 95.49%, Docusaurus with 2.04%, OneSky with 0.46% market share.
| Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPML | 263643 | 95.49% | XTRF vs WPML |
| Docusaurus | 5644 | 2.04% | XTRF vs Docusaurus |
| OneSky | 1259 | 0.46% | XTRF vs OneSky |
| Memsource | 1092 | 0.40% | XTRF vs Memsource |
| Crowdin | 673 | 0.24% | XTRF vs Crowdin |
| Bablic | 609 | 0.22% | XTRF vs Bablic |
| SDL Trados Studio | 459 | 0.17% | XTRF vs SDL Trados Studio |
| Lokalise | 325 | 0.12% | XTRF vs Lokalise |
| Otter | 234 | 0.08% | XTRF vs Otter |
| Plunet | 178 | 0.06% | XTRF vs Plunet |
| Interpreter Intelligence | 171 | 0.06% | XTRF vs Interpreter Intelligence |
| memoQ | 147 | 0.05% | XTRF vs memoQ |
| Systran | 115 | 0.04% | XTRF vs Systran |
| Acolad | 92 | 0.03% | XTRF vs Acolad |
| Phrase | 90 | 0.03% | XTRF vs Phrase |
| Gengo | 81 | 0.03% | XTRF vs Gengo |
| Interprefy | 75 | 0.03% | XTRF vs Interprefy |
| LanguageLine | 72 | 0.03% | XTRF vs LanguageLine |
| Unbabel | 72 | 0.03% | XTRF vs Unbabel |
| POEditor | 70 | 0.03% | XTRF vs POEditor |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of XTRF’s competitors in the Translation And Localization category are WPML with 95.49%, Docusaurus with 2.04%, OneSky with 0.46% market share.
XTRF vs WPML
XTRF vs Docusaurus
XTRF vs OneSky
XTRF vs Memsource
XTRF vs Crowdin
XTRF vs Bablic
XTRF vs SDL Trados Studio
XTRF vs Lokalise
Around the world in 2026, over 141 companies have started using XTRF as Translation And Localization tool.
| Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arvato | 10,000+ | Guetersloh | North Rhine-Westphalia | Germany | |
| Transcom | 10,000+ | Stockholm | Stockholm | Sweden | |
| DHL Asia Pacific Shared Services Sdn Bhd | 10,000+ | Petaling Jaya | Selangor | Malaysia | |
| Sony Interactive Entertainment | 10,000+ | San Mateo | California | United States | |
| Allianz | 10,000+ | Munich | Bavaria | Germany | |
| IQVIA | 10,000+ | Durham | North Carolina | United States | |
| Workday | 10,000+ | Pleasanton | California | United States | |
| LanguageLine Solutions | 10,000+ | Monterey | California | United States | |
| Target | 10,000+ | Minneapolis | Minnesota | United States | |
| AT&T | 10,000+ | Dallas | Texas | United States |
The top three products and services offering customers that use XTRF for Translation And Localization are Translation (34), Localization (20), Interpreting (16).
Customers
The majority of XTRF's customers for the translation-and-localization category fall in the company size of 20 - 49 employees (50 companies), 100 - 249 employees (33 companies), 0 - 9 employees (16 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of XTRF for translation-and-localization are the United States with 45(42.86%), United Kingdom with 16(15.24%), Spain with 11(10.48%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top XTRF competitors?
XTRF’s Top competitors in the translation-and-localization category are WPML, Docusaurus, OneSky. You can view a full list of XTRF competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of XTRF and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare XTRF and its feature with top competitors here : XTRF vs WPML XTRF vs Docusaurus XTRF vs OneSky.
What is XTRF customer distribution based on company size?
What is XTRF market share in the translation-and-localization?
What are the top countries that use XTRF?
What are the top industries that use XTRF?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo