Open source framework for developing database-driven websites, applications and APIs in Node.js.
Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of KeystoneJS’s competitors in the Static Site Publisher category are AMP with 92.87%, Hugo with 6.65%, Jekyll with 0.33% market share.
Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
---|---|---|---|
AMP | 261028 | 92.87% | KeystoneJS vs AMP |
Hugo | 18701 | 6.65% | KeystoneJS vs Hugo |
Jekyll | 929 | 0.33% | KeystoneJS vs Jekyll |
Surge | 144 | 0.05% | KeystoneJS vs Surge |
Divshot | 41 | 0.01% | KeystoneJS vs Divshot |
Harp.io | 33 | 0.01% | KeystoneJS vs Harp.io |
GitLab Pages | 22 | 0.01% | KeystoneJS vs GitLab Pages |
Paperplane.io | 16 | 0.01% | KeystoneJS vs Paperplane.io |
Aerobatic | 16 | 0.01% | KeystoneJS vs Aerobatic |
Phenomic | 11 | 0.00% | KeystoneJS vs Phenomic |
Middleman | 10 | 0.00% | KeystoneJS vs Middleman |
Apache Forrest | 10 | 0.00% | KeystoneJS vs Apache Forrest |
Ruhoh | 10 | 0.00% | KeystoneJS vs Ruhoh |
Metalsmith | 3 | 0.00% | KeystoneJS vs Metalsmith |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of KeystoneJS’s competitors in the Static Site Publisher category are AMP with 92.87%, Hugo with 6.65%, Jekyll with 0.33% market share.
KeystoneJS vs AMP
KeystoneJS vs Hugo
KeystoneJS vs Jekyll
KeystoneJS vs Surge
KeystoneJS vs Divshot
KeystoneJS vs Harp.io
KeystoneJS vs GitLab Pages
KeystoneJS vs Paperplane.io
Around the world in 2025, over 103 companies have started using KeystoneJS as Static Site Publisher tool.
Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dell | 10,000+ | Round Rock | Texas | United States | |
SAP | 10,000+ | Walldorf | Baden-Wuerttemberg | Germany | |
Cisco | 10,000+ | San Jose | California | United States | |
Netflix | 10,000+ | Los Gatos | California | United States | |
Stefanini | 10,000+ | Sao Paulo | Sao Paulo | Brazil | |
Virtusa | 10,000+ | Southborough | Massachusetts | United States | |
IBM | 10,000+ | Armonk | New York | United States | |
Seven West Media | 10,000+ | Osborne Park | Western Australia | Australia | |
ASUS | 10,000+ | Taipei | Taiwan | Taiwan | |
Oxford University Press | 10,000+ | Oxford | England | United Kingdom |
The top three products and services offering customers that use KeystoneJS for Static Site Publisher are Software (6), Technology (6), Software Development (5).
Customers
The majority of KeystoneJS's customers for the static-site-publisher category fall in the company size of 20 - 49 employees (24 companies), 100 - 249 employees (21 companies), 0 - 9 employees (18 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of KeystoneJS for static-site-publisher are the United States with 39(51.32%), United Kingdom with 10(13.16%), Australia with 6(7.89%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top KeystoneJS competitors?
KeystoneJS’s Top competitors in the static-site-publisher category are AMP, Hugo, Jekyll. You can view a full list of KeystoneJS competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of KeystoneJS and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare KeystoneJS and its feature with top competitors here : KeystoneJS vs AMP KeystoneJS vs Hugo KeystoneJS vs Jekyll.
What is KeystoneJS customer distribution based on company size?
What is KeystoneJS market share in the static-site-publisher?
What are the top countries that use KeystoneJS?
What are the top industries that use KeystoneJS?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo