Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of PhantomJS’s competitors in the Libraries And Widgets category are JQuery UI with 28.28%, Popper.JS with 10.12%, AOS with 9.23% market share.
Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
---|---|---|---|
JQuery UI | 1078758 | 28.28% | PhantomJS vs JQuery UI |
Popper.JS | 385890 | 10.12% | PhantomJS vs Popper.JS |
AOS | 352183 | 9.23% | PhantomJS vs AOS |
Packery | 284297 | 7.45% | PhantomJS vs Packery |
POWr | 261096 | 6.85% | PhantomJS vs POWr |
Meta Graph Api | 219482 | 5.75% | PhantomJS vs Meta Graph Api |
OpenSSL | 172692 | 4.53% | PhantomJS vs OpenSSL |
Elfsight | 168890 | 4.43% | PhantomJS vs Elfsight |
Plupload | 130103 | 3.41% | PhantomJS vs Plupload |
ScrollReveal.js | 89815 | 2.35% | PhantomJS vs ScrollReveal.js |
Meta Plugins | 78456 | 2.06% | PhantomJS vs Meta Plugins |
selectivizr | 72022 | 1.89% | PhantomJS vs selectivizr |
Turbolinks | 65810 | 1.73% | PhantomJS vs Turbolinks |
jCarousel | 52859 | 1.39% | PhantomJS vs jCarousel |
Google Publisher Tag | 52114 | 1.37% | PhantomJS vs Google Publisher Tag |
Retina JS | 50021 | 1.31% | PhantomJS vs Retina JS |
Adobe Flash | 47271 | 1.24% | PhantomJS vs Adobe Flash |
Lodash | 27650 | 0.72% | PhantomJS vs Lodash |
React Native | 25420 | 0.67% | PhantomJS vs React Native |
ReactiveX | 21753 | 0.57% | PhantomJS vs ReactiveX |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of PhantomJS’s competitors in the Libraries And Widgets category are JQuery UI with 28.28%, Popper.JS with 10.12%, AOS with 9.23% market share.
PhantomJS vs JQuery UI
PhantomJS vs Popper.JS
PhantomJS vs AOS
PhantomJS vs Packery
PhantomJS vs POWr
PhantomJS vs Meta Graph Api
PhantomJS vs OpenSSL
PhantomJS vs Elfsight
Around the world in 2025, over 847 companies have started using PhantomJS as Libraries And Widgets tool.
Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPMorgan Chase | 10,000+ | New York City | New York | United States | |
Sogeti | 10,000+ | Issy-les-Moulineaux | Ile-de-France | France | |
Thomson Reuters | 10,000+ | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | |
Samsung | 10,000+ | Suwon | Gyeonggi-do | Korea | |
L.M. Ericsson | 10,000+ | Stockholm | Stockholm | Sweden | |
Inetum | 10,000+ | Saint-Ouen | Ile-de-France | France | |
Infosys | 10,000+ | Bengaluru | Karnataka | India | |
Republic Services | 10,000+ | Phoenix | Arizona | United States | |
Sony | 10,000+ | Tokyo | Tokyo | Japan | |
Bestseller | 10,000+ | Brande | Central Jutland | Denmark |
The top three products and services offering customers that use PhantomJS for Libraries And Widgets are Software Development (38), Cloud Services (37), Data Analytics (29).
Customers
The majority of PhantomJS's customers for the libraries-and-widgets category fall in the company size of 10,000+ employees (149 companies), 100 - 249 employees (139 companies), 20 - 49 employees (138 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of PhantomJS for libraries-and-widgets are the United States with 382(57.27%), United Kingdom with 71(10.64%), India with 45(6.75%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top PhantomJS competitors?
PhantomJS’s Top competitors in the libraries-and-widgets category are JQuery UI, Popper.JS, AOS. You can view a full list of PhantomJS competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of PhantomJS and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare PhantomJS and its feature with top competitors here : PhantomJS vs JQuery UI PhantomJS vs Popper.JS PhantomJS vs AOS.
What is PhantomJS customer distribution based on company size?
What is PhantomJS market share in the libraries-and-widgets?
What are the top countries that use PhantomJS?
What are the top industries that use PhantomJS?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo