Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of P.A.C.S.’s competitors in the Debt Collection category are athenaCollector with 74.48%, SAP Collections and Dispute Management with 4.89%, FinancialForce Accounting with 4.50% market share.
Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
---|---|---|---|
athenaCollector | 6361 | 74.48% | P.A.C.S. vs athenaCollector |
SAP Collections and Dispute Management | 418 | 4.89% | P.A.C.S. vs SAP Collections and Dispute Management |
FinancialForce Accounting | 384 | 4.50% | P.A.C.S. vs FinancialForce Accounting |
bpm'online financial CRM | 314 | 3.68% | P.A.C.S. vs bpm'online financial CRM |
Swordfish | 243 | 2.85% | P.A.C.S. vs Swordfish |
Oracle Advanced Collections | 200 | 2.34% | P.A.C.S. vs Oracle Advanced Collections |
PhoneBurner | 77 | 0.90% | P.A.C.S. vs PhoneBurner |
Simplicity | 59 | 0.69% | P.A.C.S. vs Simplicity |
Payment Savvy | 58 | 0.68% | P.A.C.S. vs Payment Savvy |
O2B | 42 | 0.49% | P.A.C.S. vs O2B |
Fundbox | 32 | 0.37% | P.A.C.S. vs Fundbox |
ezyCollect | 30 | 0.35% | P.A.C.S. vs ezyCollect |
MY DSO MANAGER | 25 | 0.29% | P.A.C.S. vs MY DSO MANAGER |
ACE | 24 | 0.28% | P.A.C.S. vs ACE |
CARM-Pro | 23 | 0.27% | P.A.C.S. vs CARM-Pro |
CasetrackerLaw | 16 | 0.19% | P.A.C.S. vs CasetrackerLaw |
VoyagerNetz | 16 | 0.19% | P.A.C.S. vs VoyagerNetz |
Insly | 16 | 0.19% | P.A.C.S. vs Insly |
Katabat | 14 | 0.16% | P.A.C.S. vs Katabat |
masterQueue | 13 | 0.15% | P.A.C.S. vs masterQueue |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of P.A.C.S.’s competitors in the Debt Collection category are athenaCollector with 74.48%, SAP Collections and Dispute Management with 4.89%, FinancialForce Accounting with 4.50% market share.
P.A.C.S. vs athenaCollector
P.A.C.S. vs SAP Collections and Dispute Management
P.A.C.S. vs FinancialForce Accounting
P.A.C.S. vs bpm'online financial CRM
P.A.C.S. vs Swordfish
P.A.C.S. vs Oracle Advanced Collections
P.A.C.S. vs PhoneBurner
P.A.C.S. vs Simplicity
Around the world in 2025, over 3 companies have started using P.A.C.S. as Debt Collection tool.
Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Porcupine Computer Systems | 20 - 49 | Greater Sudbury | Ontario | Canada | |
Credit Bureau | 10 - 19 | Greater Sudbury | Ontario | Canada | |
Credit Bureau Of Timmins | 10 - 19 | Timmins | Ontario | Canada |
The majority of P.A.C.S.'s customers for the debt-collection category fall in the company size of 10 - 19 employees (2 companies), 20 - 49 employees (1 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of P.A.C.S. for debt-collection are the Canada with 3(100.00%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top P.A.C.S. competitors?
P.A.C.S.’s Top competitors in the debt-collection category are athenaCollector, SAP Collections and Dispute Management, FinancialForce Accounting. You can view a full list of P.A.C.S. competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of P.A.C.S. and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare P.A.C.S. and its feature with top competitors here : P.A.C.S. vs athenaCollector P.A.C.S. vs SAP Collections and Dispute Management P.A.C.S. vs FinancialForce Accounting.
What is P.A.C.S. customer distribution based on company size?
What is P.A.C.S. market share in the debt-collection?
What are the top countries that use P.A.C.S.?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo