ActionX connects gaps between mobile customer acquisition and mobile retargeting to drive transactions and improve customer lifetime value.
Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of ActionX’s competitors in the Cross-Device Targeting category are Signal with 40.64%, Tapad with 23.58%, The Trade Desk with 16.53% market share.
| Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signal | 3235 | 40.64% | ActionX vs Signal |
| Tapad | 1877 | 23.58% | ActionX vs Tapad |
| The Trade Desk | 1316 | 16.53% | ActionX vs The Trade Desk |
| Qualia | 881 | 11.07% | ActionX vs Qualia |
| Sociomantic | 268 | 3.37% | ActionX vs Sociomantic |
| Drawbridge | 138 | 1.73% | ActionX vs Drawbridge |
| Experian Marketing Suite | 66 | 0.83% | ActionX vs Experian Marketing Suite |
| Appier | 52 | 0.65% | ActionX vs Appier |
| dstillery | 43 | 0.54% | ActionX vs dstillery |
| Digilant | 21 | 0.26% | ActionX vs Digilant |
| RhythmOne | 18 | 0.23% | ActionX vs RhythmOne |
| Augur | 13 | 0.16% | ActionX vs Augur |
| C3 Metrics | 9 | 0.11% | ActionX vs C3 Metrics |
| Crosswise | 6 | 0.08% | ActionX vs Crosswise |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of ActionX’s competitors in the Cross-Device Targeting category are Signal with 40.64%, Tapad with 23.58%, The Trade Desk with 16.53% market share.
ActionX vs Signal
ActionX vs Tapad
ActionX vs The Trade Desk
ActionX vs Qualia
ActionX vs Sociomantic
ActionX vs Drawbridge
ActionX vs Experian Marketing Suite
ActionX vs Appier
Around the world in 2026, over 18 companies have started using ActionX as Cross-Device Targeting tool.
| Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Fetal Medicine Foundation | 100 - 249 | London | England | United Kingdom | |
| Cincinnati Mom Collective | 20 - 49 | Cincinnati | Ohio | United States | |
| Action X | 20 - 49 | Singapore | Central Singapore | Singapore | |
| FractionX | 20 - 49 | Apex | North Carolina | United States | |
| Black Achievers | 10 - 19 | Columbus | Ohio | United States | |
| 2birds1blog | 0 - 9 | Washington, D.C. | Washington, D.C. | United States | |
| CoactionX | 0 - 9 | New York City | New York | United States | |
| Transactionx | 0 - 9 | Minneapolis | Minnesota | United States | |
| Bevilacqua Helfant Ventures | 0 - 9 | New York City | New York | United States | |
| a. party style | 0 - 9 | New York City | New York | United States |
The top three products and services offering customers that use ActionX for Cross-Device Targeting are Sports Entertainment (1), Tax Planning (1), Business Success (1).
Customers
The majority of ActionX's customers for the cross-device-targeting category fall in the company size of 0 - 9 employees (10 companies), 20 - 49 employees (4 companies), 10 - 19 employees (2 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of ActionX for cross-device-targeting are the United States with 13(72.22%), Singapore with 1(5.56%), United Kingdom with 1(5.56%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top ActionX competitors?
ActionX’s Top competitors in the cross-device-targeting category are Signal, Tapad, The Trade Desk. You can view a full list of ActionX competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of ActionX and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare ActionX and its feature with top competitors here : ActionX vs Signal ActionX vs Tapad ActionX vs The Trade Desk.
What is ActionX customer distribution based on company size?
What is ActionX market share in the cross-device-targeting?
What are the top countries that use ActionX?
What are the top industries that use ActionX?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo