Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of Snap CI’s competitors in the Continuous Integration And Delivery category are Jenkins with 47.88%, Atlassian Bitbucket with 18.64%, TeamCity with 4.94% market share.
| Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jenkins | 55765 | 47.88% | Snap CI vs Jenkins |
| Atlassian Bitbucket | 21708 | 18.64% | Snap CI vs Atlassian Bitbucket |
| TeamCity | 5753 | 4.94% | Snap CI vs TeamCity |
| CircleCI | 5633 | 4.84% | Snap CI vs CircleCI |
| Bitbucket Pipelines | 5279 | 4.53% | Snap CI vs Bitbucket Pipelines |
| Apache JMeter | 4743 | 4.07% | Snap CI vs Apache JMeter |
| AWS CodePipeline | 3683 | 3.16% | Snap CI vs AWS CodePipeline |
| Platform.sh | 1776 | 1.52% | Snap CI vs Platform.sh |
| Atlassian Bamboo | 1605 | 1.38% | Snap CI vs Atlassian Bamboo |
| Sauce Labs | 1450 | 1.24% | Snap CI vs Sauce Labs |
| Spinnaker | 1404 | 1.21% | Snap CI vs Spinnaker |
| Bitrise | 1378 | 1.18% | Snap CI vs Bitrise |
| Travis CI | 1301 | 1.12% | Snap CI vs Travis CI |
| Semaphore | 712 | 0.61% | Snap CI vs Semaphore |
| GoCD | 694 | 0.60% | Snap CI vs GoCD |
| Concourse CI | 591 | 0.51% | Snap CI vs Concourse CI |
| CloudBees CodeShip | 295 | 0.25% | Snap CI vs CloudBees CodeShip |
| CloudBees CI | 282 | 0.24% | Snap CI vs CloudBees CI |
| Buildbot | 258 | 0.22% | Snap CI vs Buildbot |
| Flosum | 257 | 0.22% | Snap CI vs Flosum |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of Snap CI’s competitors in the Continuous Integration And Delivery category are Jenkins with 47.88%, Atlassian Bitbucket with 18.64%, TeamCity with 4.94% market share.
Snap CI vs Jenkins
Snap CI vs Atlassian Bitbucket
Snap CI vs TeamCity
Snap CI vs CircleCI
Snap CI vs Bitbucket Pipelines
Snap CI vs Apache JMeter
Snap CI vs AWS CodePipeline
Snap CI vs Platform.sh
Around the world in 2026, over 10 companies have started using Snap CI as Continuous Integration And Delivery tool.
| Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Björn Andersson | 50 - 99 | Norrkoeping | OEstergoetland | Sweden | |
| Kelvin Nicholson | 0 - 9 | Newtown | New South Wales | Australia | |
| Cgz | 0 - 9 | McMinnville | Oregon | United States | |
| Muranga James | 0 - 9 | Oakland | California | United States | |
| ConFoo.ca | 0 - 9 | Boisbriand | Quebec | Canada | |
| Alexis Janvier | 20 - 49 | Caen | Normandy | France | |
| Martin Fowler | 10 - 19 | Louisville | Kentucky | United States | |
| Securesql | 10 - 19 | San Francisco | California | United States | |
| Kent C. Dodds Tech LLC | 0 - 9 | Pleasant Grove | Utah | United States | |
| SUSHILA PUBLICATION & PRINTERS Pvt Ltd | 20 - 49 | Ranchi | Jharkhand | India |
The majority of Snap CI's customers for the continuos-integration category fall in the company size of 0 - 9 employees (5 companies), 20 - 49 employees (2 companies), 10 - 19 employees (2 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of Snap CI for continuos-integration are the United States with 5(50.00%), France with 1(10.00%), Australia with 1(10.00%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top Snap CI competitors?
Snap CI’s Top competitors in the continuos-integration category are Jenkins, Atlassian Bitbucket, TeamCity. You can view a full list of Snap CI competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of Snap CI and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare Snap CI and its feature with top competitors here : Snap CI vs Jenkins Snap CI vs Atlassian Bitbucket Snap CI vs TeamCity.
What is Snap CI customer distribution based on company size?
What is Snap CI market share in the continuos-integration?
What are the top countries that use Snap CI?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo