Miro is an online collaborative whiteboarding platform that enables distributed teams to work effectively together.
Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of Miro’s competitors in the Collaborative Whiteboards category are Jamboard with 3.11%, Moqups with 2.17%, AWW with 1.41% market share.
Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
---|---|---|---|
Jamboard | 269 | 3.11% | Miro vs Jamboard |
Moqups | 188 | 2.17% | Miro vs Moqups |
AWW | 122 | 1.41% | Miro vs AWW |
Conceptboard | 101 | 1.17% | Miro vs Conceptboard |
Microsoft Whiteboard | 53 | 0.61% | Miro vs Microsoft Whiteboard |
Scribblar | 41 | 0.47% | Miro vs Scribblar |
VIA3 | 34 | 0.39% | Miro vs VIA3 |
Unlimited Conferencing | 31 | 0.36% | Miro vs Unlimited Conferencing |
Lucidspark | 30 | 0.35% | Miro vs Lucidspark |
Stormboard | 21 | 0.24% | Miro vs Stormboard |
Deekit | 21 | 0.24% | Miro vs Deekit |
Groupboard | 14 | 0.16% | Miro vs Groupboard |
Deskle | 14 | 0.16% | Miro vs Deskle |
Sketchboard | 9 | 0.10% | Miro vs Sketchboard |
Tamashare | 9 | 0.10% | Miro vs Tamashare |
Rye Board | 7 | 0.08% | Miro vs Rye Board |
Voxwire | 6 | 0.07% | Miro vs Voxwire |
Collaboard | 5 | 0.06% | Miro vs Collaboard |
Limnu | 5 | 0.06% | Miro vs Limnu |
White | 4 | 0.05% | Miro vs White |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of Miro’s competitors in the Collaborative Whiteboards category are Jamboard with 3.11%, Moqups with 2.17%, AWW with 1.41% market share.
Miro vs Jamboard
Miro vs Moqups
Miro vs AWW
Miro vs Conceptboard
Miro vs Microsoft Whiteboard
Miro vs Scribblar
Miro vs VIA3
Miro vs Unlimited Conferencing
Around the world in 2025, over 7656 companies have started using Miro as Collaborative Whiteboards tool.
Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Washington University In St. Louis | 10,000+ | St. Louis | Missouri | United States | |
George Washington University | 10,000+ | Washington, D.C. | Washington, D.C. | United States | |
The RSA | 10,000+ | London | England | United Kingdom | |
York University | 5,000 - 9,999 | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | |
Fordham University | 5,000 - 9,999 | The Bronx | New York | United States | |
Ege University | 5,000 - 9,999 | Izmir | Izmir | Turkey | |
PBS | 5,000 - 9,999 | Bern | Bern | Switzerland | |
Freelancers | 5,000 - 9,999 | Palo Alto | California | United States | |
University Of Sydney | 5,000 - 9,999 | Sydney | New South Wales | Australia | |
Universidad Católica San Pablo | 5,000 - 9,999 | Arequipa | Arequipa | Peru |
The top three products and services offering customers that use Miro for Collaborative Whiteboards are Consulting (171), Digital Transformation (156), Software Development (150).
Customers
The majority of Miro's customers for the collaborative-whiteboards category fall in the company size of 20 - 49 employees (1293 companies), 0 - 9 employees (1159 companies), 100 - 249 employees (1069 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of Miro for collaborative-whiteboards are the United States with 2474(43.30%), United Kingdom with 757(13.25%), Germany with 627(10.97%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top Miro competitors?
Miro’s Top competitors in the collaborative-whiteboards category are Jamboard, Moqups, AWW. You can view a full list of Miro competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of Miro and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare Miro and its feature with top competitors here : Miro vs Jamboard Miro vs Moqups Miro vs AWW.
What is Miro customer distribution based on company size?
What is Miro market share in the collaborative-whiteboards?
What are the top countries that use Miro?
What are the top industries that use Miro?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo