BrowseEmAll is an on-premises solution for manual and automated cross browser testing.
Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of BrowseEmAll’s competitors in the Browser Testing category are CodePen with 95.42%, Cypress.io with 1.95%, Marker.io with 1.07% market share.
| Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
|---|---|---|---|
| CodePen | 370265 | 95.42% | BrowseEmAll vs CodePen |
| Cypress.io | 7576 | 1.95% | BrowseEmAll vs Cypress.io |
| Marker.io | 4155 | 1.07% | BrowseEmAll vs Marker.io |
| BrowserStack | 3411 | 0.88% | BrowseEmAll vs BrowserStack |
| TestCafe | 830 | 0.21% | BrowseEmAll vs TestCafe |
| LambdaTest | 400 | 0.10% | BrowseEmAll vs LambdaTest |
| iMacros | 275 | 0.07% | BrowseEmAll vs iMacros |
| Rainforest QA | 248 | 0.06% | BrowseEmAll vs Rainforest QA |
| Ghost Inspector | 215 | 0.06% | BrowseEmAll vs Ghost Inspector |
| Browserling | 194 | 0.05% | BrowseEmAll vs Browserling |
| NightwatchJS | 168 | 0.04% | BrowseEmAll vs NightwatchJS |
| Kobiton | 124 | 0.03% | BrowseEmAll vs Kobiton |
| TestingBot | 58 | 0.01% | BrowseEmAll vs TestingBot |
| Browsersync | 51 | 0.01% | BrowseEmAll vs Browsersync |
| Attensee | 17 | 0.00% | BrowseEmAll vs Attensee |
| EveryStep | 7 | 0.00% | BrowseEmAll vs EveryStep |
| MultiBrowser | 7 | 0.00% | BrowseEmAll vs MultiBrowser |
| DalekJS | 7 | 0.00% | BrowseEmAll vs DalekJS |
| Testling | 6 | 0.00% | BrowseEmAll vs Testling |
| Aerokube Moon | 4 | 0.00% | BrowseEmAll vs Aerokube Moon |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of BrowseEmAll’s competitors in the Browser Testing category are CodePen with 95.42%, Cypress.io with 1.95%, Marker.io with 1.07% market share.
BrowseEmAll vs CodePen
BrowseEmAll vs Cypress.io
BrowseEmAll vs Marker.io
BrowseEmAll vs BrowserStack
BrowseEmAll vs TestCafe
BrowseEmAll vs LambdaTest
BrowseEmAll vs iMacros
BrowseEmAll vs Rainforest QA
Around the world in 2026, over 5 companies have started using BrowseEmAll as Browser Testing tool.
| Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Rechtspraak | 10,000+ | The Hague | South Holland | Netherlands | |
| Virtusa | 10,000+ | Southborough | Massachusetts | United States | |
| Ministerie Van Justitie En Veiligheid | 10,000+ | The Hague | South Holland | Netherlands | |
| Santander Consumer USA | 5,000 - 9,999 | Dallas | Texas | United States | |
| MultiBrowser | 0 - 9 | Singapore | Central Singapore | Singapore |
The top three products and services offering customers that use BrowseEmAll for Browser Testing are European Union Affairs (1), Auto Financing (1), Legal documentation (1).
Customers
The majority of BrowseEmAll's customers for the browser-testing category fall in the company size of 10,000+ employees (3 companies), 5,000 - 9,999 employees (1 companies), 0 - 9 employees (1 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of BrowseEmAll for browser-testing are the Netherlands with 2(40.00%), United States with 2(40.00%), Singapore with 1(20.00%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top BrowseEmAll competitors?
BrowseEmAll’s Top competitors in the browser-testing category are CodePen, Cypress.io, Marker.io. You can view a full list of BrowseEmAll competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of BrowseEmAll and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare BrowseEmAll and its feature with top competitors here : BrowseEmAll vs CodePen BrowseEmAll vs Cypress.io BrowseEmAll vs Marker.io.
What is BrowseEmAll customer distribution based on company size?
What is BrowseEmAll market share in the browser-testing?
What are the top countries that use BrowseEmAll?
What are the top industries that use BrowseEmAll?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo