Treasure Data is an end-to-end, fully-managed cloud service for big data.
Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of Treasure Data’s competitors in the Big Data Infrastructure category are Apache Spark with 34.92%, Amazon Redshift with 27.77%, Cloudera with 12.02% market share.
Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
---|---|---|---|
Apache Spark | 10992 | 34.92% | Treasure Data vs Apache Spark |
Amazon Redshift | 8741 | 27.77% | Treasure Data vs Amazon Redshift |
Cloudera | 3782 | 12.02% | Treasure Data vs Cloudera |
Amazon EMR | 3471 | 11.03% | Treasure Data vs Amazon EMR |
Apache Hive | 2531 | 8.04% | Treasure Data vs Apache Hive |
Google Cloud Dataproc | 574 | 1.82% | Treasure Data vs Google Cloud Dataproc |
Qubole | 131 | 0.42% | Treasure Data vs Qubole |
Vertica | 97 | 0.31% | Treasure Data vs Vertica |
GridGain | 74 | 0.24% | Treasure Data vs GridGain |
BlueData | 39 | 0.12% | Treasure Data vs BlueData |
Pivotal HDB | 19 | 0.06% | Treasure Data vs Pivotal HDB |
Apache Bigtop | 10 | 0.03% | Treasure Data vs Apache Bigtop |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of Treasure Data’s competitors in the Big Data Infrastructure category are Apache Spark with 34.92%, Amazon Redshift with 27.77%, Cloudera with 12.02% market share.
Treasure Data vs Apache Spark
Treasure Data vs Amazon Redshift
Treasure Data vs Cloudera
Treasure Data vs Amazon EMR
Treasure Data vs Apache Hive
Treasure Data vs Google Cloud Dataproc
Treasure Data vs Qubole
Treasure Data vs Vertica
Around the world in 2025, over 1015 companies have started using Treasure Data as Big Data Infrastructure tool.
Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sekisui House | 10,000+ | Osaka | Osaka | Japan | |
Maruti Suzuki India Limited | 10,000+ | New Delhi | NCT | India | |
Brookdale Senior Living | 10,000+ | Brentwood | Tennessee | United States | |
Yamada Denki | 10,000+ | Takasaki | Gunma | Japan | |
Nomura Research Institute | 10,000+ | Tokyo | Tokyo | Japan | |
Wantedly | 5,000 - 9,999 | Tokyo | Tokyo | Japan | |
Asahi | 5,000 - 9,999 | Tokyo | Tokyo | Japan | |
Nintendo | 5,000 - 9,999 | Redmond | Washington | United States | |
森永乳業株式会社 | 5,000 - 9,999 | Tokyo | Tokyo | Japan | |
Ezaki Glico USA | 5,000 - 9,999 | Osaka | Osaka | Japan |
The top three products and services offering customers that use Treasure Data for Big Data Infrastructure are Marketing (37), News (33), Advertising (30).
Customers
The majority of Treasure Data's customers for the big-data-infrastructure category fall in the company size of 20 - 49 employees (209 companies), 100 - 249 employees (177 companies), 250 - 499 employees (123 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of Treasure Data for big-data-infrastructure are the United States with 335(38.59%), Japan with 304(35.02%), United Kingdom with 88(10.14%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top Treasure Data competitors?
Treasure Data’s Top competitors in the big-data-infrastructure category are Apache Spark, Amazon Redshift, Cloudera. You can view a full list of Treasure Data competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of Treasure Data and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare Treasure Data and its feature with top competitors here : Treasure Data vs Apache Spark Treasure Data vs Amazon Redshift Treasure Data vs Cloudera.
What is Treasure Data customer distribution based on company size?
What is Treasure Data market share in the big-data-infrastructure?
What are the top countries that use Treasure Data?
What are the top industries that use Treasure Data?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo