Treasure Data is an end-to-end, fully-managed cloud service for big data.
Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of Treasure Data’s competitors in the Big Data Infrastructure category are Apache Spark with 36.98%, Amazon Redshift with 27.36%, Amazon EMR with 11.19% market share.
| Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Spark | 18833 | 36.98% | Treasure Data vs Apache Spark |
| Amazon Redshift | 13931 | 27.36% | Treasure Data vs Amazon Redshift |
| Amazon EMR | 5699 | 11.19% | Treasure Data vs Amazon EMR |
| Cloudera | 5332 | 10.47% | Treasure Data vs Cloudera |
| Apache Hive | 4209 | 8.27% | Treasure Data vs Apache Hive |
| Google Cloud Dataproc | 1467 | 2.88% | Treasure Data vs Google Cloud Dataproc |
| Vertica | 310 | 0.61% | Treasure Data vs Vertica |
| GridGain | 228 | 0.45% | Treasure Data vs GridGain |
| Qubole | 165 | 0.32% | Treasure Data vs Qubole |
| BlueData | 45 | 0.09% | Treasure Data vs BlueData |
| Pivotal HDB | 34 | 0.07% | Treasure Data vs Pivotal HDB |
| Apache Bigtop | 15 | 0.03% | Treasure Data vs Apache Bigtop |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of Treasure Data’s competitors in the Big Data Infrastructure category are Apache Spark with 36.98%, Amazon Redshift with 27.36%, Amazon EMR with 11.19% market share.
Treasure Data vs Apache Spark
Treasure Data vs Amazon Redshift
Treasure Data vs Amazon EMR
Treasure Data vs Cloudera
Treasure Data vs Apache Hive
Treasure Data vs Google Cloud Dataproc
Treasure Data vs Vertica
Treasure Data vs GridGain
Around the world in 2026, over 649 companies have started using Treasure Data as Big Data Infrastructure tool.
| Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danfoss | 10,000+ | Nordborg | South Denmark | Denmark | |
| Sony | 10,000+ | Tokyo | Tokyo | Japan | |
| SUMITOMO MITSUI BANKING CORPORATION | 10,000+ | Tokyo | Tokyo | Japan | |
| CNH | 10,000+ | Basildon | England | United Kingdom | |
| Puma | 10,000+ | Herzogenaurach | Bavaria | Germany | |
| National Fraternal Order Of Police | 10,000+ | Nashville | Tennessee | United States | |
| Informa | 10,000+ | London | England | United Kingdom | |
| AXA | 10,000+ | Paris | Ile-de-France | France | |
| Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 10,000+ | New Britain | Connecticut | United States | |
| Honda R&D Americas, LLC | 10,000+ | Torrance | California | United States |
The top three products and services offering customers that use Treasure Data for Big Data Infrastructure are Marketing (28), Advertising (16), Digital Marketing (15).
Customers
The majority of Treasure Data's customers for the big-data-infrastructure category fall in the company size of 100 - 249 employees (140 companies), 10,000+ employees (113 companies), 20 - 49 employees (95 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of Treasure Data for big-data-infrastructure are the United States with 258(43.43%), Japan with 217(36.53%), United Kingdom with 38(6.40%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top Treasure Data competitors?
Treasure Data’s Top competitors in the big-data-infrastructure category are Apache Spark, Amazon Redshift, Amazon EMR. You can view a full list of Treasure Data competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of Treasure Data and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare Treasure Data and its feature with top competitors here : Treasure Data vs Apache Spark Treasure Data vs Amazon Redshift Treasure Data vs Amazon EMR.
What is Treasure Data customer distribution based on company size?
What is Treasure Data market share in the big-data-infrastructure?
What are the top countries that use Treasure Data?
What are the top industries that use Treasure Data?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo