Categories where IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive compete
IBM Content Manager OnDemand
Comparing the customer bases of IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive, we can see that IBM Content Manager OnDemand has 69 customer(s), while OpenText InfoArchive has 40 customer(s). In the Archiving category, with 69 customer(s) IBM Content Manager OnDemand stands at 9th place by ranking, while OpenText InfoArchive with 40 customer(s), is at the 11th place.
IBM Content Manager OnDemand
9th
69 Customer
OpenText InfoArchive
11th
40 Customer
IBM Content Manager OnDemand has a 4.09% market share in the Archiving category, while OpenText InfoArchive has a 2.37% market share in the same space.
Comparing IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive customers based on their geographic location, we can see that IBM Content Manager OnDemand has more customers in United States, United Kingdom and France, while OpenText InfoArchive has more customers in United States.
IBM Content Manager OnDemand
OpenText InfoArchive
Gain actionable insights about the buying patterns of IBM Content Manager OnDemand vs OpenText InfoArchive’s target audience.
IBM Content Manager OnDemand
OpenText InfoArchive
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
What are the different markets in which IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive compete against each other?
IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive compete against each other in the Archiving.
How does the market share of IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive compare in the Archiving market?
How many customers are acquired by IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive in the Archiving segment?
What are the countries in which IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive has more customers?
6Sense Chrome Extension
Get free emails, firmographics, technographics, and keyword intent from any website. Qualify leads on the go. Do intelligent outreaches and close deals faster.
Install Now