Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of Grav’s competitors in the Web Content Management category are Drupal with 37.36%, Drupal 7 with 20.28%, TYPO3 with 20.15% market share.
Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
---|---|---|---|
Drupal | 202188 | 37.36% | Grav vs Drupal |
Drupal 7 | 109753 | 20.28% | Grav vs Drupal 7 |
TYPO3 | 109063 | 20.15% | Grav vs TYPO3 |
HubSpot Website Platform | 29986 | 5.54% | Grav vs HubSpot Website Platform |
JSTOR | 18281 | 3.38% | Grav vs JSTOR |
Umbraco | 16861 | 3.12% | Grav vs Umbraco |
Google Feedburner | 11092 | 2.05% | Grav vs Google Feedburner |
SilverStripe | 8750 | 1.62% | Grav vs SilverStripe |
Adobe Portfolio | 7867 | 1.45% | Grav vs Adobe Portfolio |
Progress Sitefinity | 5492 | 1.01% | Grav vs Progress Sitefinity |
ProQuest | 4090 | 0.76% | Grav vs ProQuest |
Gitana | 3609 | 0.67% | Grav vs Gitana |
Xoops | 3259 | 0.60% | Grav vs Xoops |
Plone | 2164 | 0.40% | Grav vs Plone |
Microsoft Frontpage | 1556 | 0.29% | Grav vs Microsoft Frontpage |
ExpressionEngine | 622 | 0.11% | Grav vs ExpressionEngine |
Craft CMS | 585 | 0.11% | Grav vs Craft CMS |
WebSphere Portal Server | 577 | 0.11% | Grav vs WebSphere Portal Server |
Atex | 554 | 0.10% | Grav vs Atex |
HubSpot CMS Hub | 545 | 0.10% | Grav vs HubSpot CMS Hub |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of Grav’s competitors in the Web Content Management category are Drupal with 37.36%, Drupal 7 with 20.28%, TYPO3 with 20.15% market share.
Grav vs Drupal
Grav vs Drupal 7
Grav vs TYPO3
Grav vs HubSpot Website Platform
Grav vs JSTOR
Grav vs Umbraco
Grav vs Google Feedburner
Grav vs SilverStripe
Around the world in 2024, over 257 companies have started using Grav as Web Content Management tool.
Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WPenner | 1,000 - 4,999 | Edmonton | Alberta | Canada | |
Cloudways | 100 - 249 | Birkirkara | Birkirkara | Malta | |
Institut F�r Computersprachen Der Technischen Universit�t Wien | 100 - 249 | Vienna | Vienna | Austria | |
Qwords | 50 - 99 | Jakarta | Jakarta | Indonesia | |
Shell Kibæk V/Morten Hauge Dalby Madsen | 20 - 49 | Kibaek | Central Jutland | Denmark | |
Installatron | 20 - 49 | Carlisle | Virginia | United States | |
Media - web.de | 20 - 49 | Gera | Saxony-Anhalt | Germany | |
Isme-es | 20 - 49 | Barcelona | Catalonia | Spain | |
Epiphyte Corporation Pty Ltd | 10 - 19 | Bald Hills | Queensland | Australia | |
Arx Web | 10 - 19 | Huntington | West Virginia | United States |
The top three products and services offering customers that use Grav for Web Content Management are Healthcare Services (8), Social Services (8), Urban Planning (8).
Customers
The majority of Grav's customers for the web-content-management category fall in the company size of 0 - 9 employees (66 companies), 20 - 49 employees (45 companies), 1,000 - 4,999 employees (35 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of Grav for web-content-management are the United States with 80(40.61%), Sweden with 34(17.26%), Germany with 18(9.14%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top Grav competitors?
Grav’s Top competitors in the web-content-management category are Drupal, Drupal 7, TYPO3. You can view a full list of Grav competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of Grav and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare Grav and its feature with top competitors here : Grav vs Drupal Grav vs Drupal 7 Grav vs TYPO3.
What is Grav customer distribution based on company size?
What is Grav market share in the web-content-management?
What are the top countries that use Grav?
What are the top industries that use Grav?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo