IronWorker is a task processor for applications that isolates the code and dependencies of individual tasks to be processed on demand.
Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of IronWorker’s competitors in the Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing category are Apache Kafka with 39.72%, RabbitMQ with 28.14%, IBM MQ with 7.20% market share.
Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
---|---|---|---|
Apache Kafka | 22229 | 39.72% | IronWorker vs Apache Kafka |
RabbitMQ | 15751 | 28.14% | IronWorker vs RabbitMQ |
IBM MQ | 4031 | 7.20% | IronWorker vs IBM MQ |
Apache ActiveMQ | 3200 | 5.72% | IronWorker vs Apache ActiveMQ |
Realtime Framework | 2997 | 5.36% | IronWorker vs Realtime Framework |
Microsoft Azure Service Bus | 2145 | 3.83% | IronWorker vs Microsoft Azure Service Bus |
Ably Realtime | 1340 | 2.39% | IronWorker vs Ably Realtime |
Google Cloud Messaging | 1228 | 2.19% | IronWorker vs Google Cloud Messaging |
ZeroMQ | 949 | 1.70% | IronWorker vs ZeroMQ |
NServiceBus | 708 | 1.27% | IronWorker vs NServiceBus |
Gearman | 401 | 0.72% | IronWorker vs Gearman |
Hornetq | 238 | 0.43% | IronWorker vs Hornetq |
Amazon Simple Workflow Service (SWF) | 234 | 0.42% | IronWorker vs Amazon Simple Workflow Service (SWF) |
Eclipse Paho | 137 | 0.24% | IronWorker vs Eclipse Paho |
CloudAMQP | 98 | 0.18% | IronWorker vs CloudAMQP |
Apache Qpid | 62 | 0.11% | IronWorker vs Apache Qpid |
NATS | 61 | 0.11% | IronWorker vs NATS |
CloudMQTT | 32 | 0.06% | IronWorker vs CloudMQTT |
NSQ | 30 | 0.05% | IronWorker vs NSQ |
Iron.io | 26 | 0.05% | IronWorker vs Iron.io |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of IronWorker’s competitors in the Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing category are Apache Kafka with 39.72%, RabbitMQ with 28.14%, IBM MQ with 7.20% market share.
IronWorker vs Apache Kafka
IronWorker vs RabbitMQ
IronWorker vs IBM MQ
IronWorker vs Apache ActiveMQ
IronWorker vs Realtime Framework
IronWorker vs Microsoft Azure Service Bus
IronWorker vs Ably Realtime
IronWorker vs Google Cloud Messaging
Around the world in 2024, over 4 companies have started using IronWorker as Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing tool.
Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
froese.org | 100 - 249 | Calgary | Alberta | Canada | |
Iron.io | 20 - 49 | San Francisco | California | United States | |
Laravel.io | 10 - 19 | Mountain View | California | United States | |
SocialCompare | 0 - 9 | Montauroux | Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur | France |
The majority of IronWorker's customers for the queueing-messaging-and-background-processing category fall in the company size of 0 - 9 employees (1 companies), 20 - 49 employees (1 companies), 10 - 19 employees (1 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of IronWorker for queueing-messaging-and-background-processing are the United States with 2(50.00%), France with 1(25.00%), Canada with 1(25.00%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top IronWorker competitors?
IronWorker’s Top competitors in the queueing-messaging-and-background-processing category are Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ, IBM MQ. You can view a full list of IronWorker competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of IronWorker and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare IronWorker and its feature with top competitors here : IronWorker vs Apache Kafka IronWorker vs RabbitMQ IronWorker vs IBM MQ.
What is IronWorker customer distribution based on company size?
What is IronWorker market share in the queueing-messaging-and-background-processing?
What are the top countries that use IronWorker?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo