Fat Fractal delivers back-end-as-a-service (BaaS) platform that makes it easier, cheaper and faster for developers to build apps.
Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of Fat Fractal’s competitors in the Backend-as-a-Service category are Vercel with 95.09%, Azure App Service with 2.24%, Backand with 0.75% market share.
Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
---|---|---|---|
Vercel | 64986 | 95.09% | Fat Fractal vs Vercel |
Azure App Service | 1531 | 2.24% | Fat Fractal vs Azure App Service |
Backand | 513 | 0.75% | Fat Fractal vs Backand |
Hasura | 418 | 0.61% | Fat Fractal vs Hasura |
PlayFab | 214 | 0.31% | Fat Fractal vs PlayFab |
Parse | 182 | 0.27% | Fat Fractal vs Parse |
Reindex | 87 | 0.13% | Fat Fractal vs Reindex |
Graphcool | 78 | 0.11% | Fat Fractal vs Graphcool |
Kinvey | 52 | 0.08% | Fat Fractal vs Kinvey |
Back4App | 50 | 0.07% | Fat Fractal vs Back4App |
Convertigo | 44 | 0.06% | Fat Fractal vs Convertigo |
CloudBoost | 43 | 0.06% | Fat Fractal vs CloudBoost |
Backendless | 34 | 0.05% | Fat Fractal vs Backendless |
LeanCloud | 32 | 0.05% | Fat Fractal vs LeanCloud |
ChilliConnect | 15 | 0.02% | Fat Fractal vs ChilliConnect |
AnyPresence | 13 | 0.02% | Fat Fractal vs AnyPresence |
Halosys | 10 | 0.01% | Fat Fractal vs Halosys |
Apps Panel | 8 | 0.01% | Fat Fractal vs Apps Panel |
iKnode | 8 | 0.01% | Fat Fractal vs iKnode |
Apache UserGrid | 7 | 0.01% | Fat Fractal vs Apache UserGrid |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of Fat Fractal’s competitors in the Backend-as-a-Service category are Vercel with 95.09%, Azure App Service with 2.24%, Backand with 0.75% market share.
Fat Fractal vs Vercel
Fat Fractal vs Azure App Service
Fat Fractal vs Backand
Fat Fractal vs Hasura
Fat Fractal vs PlayFab
Fat Fractal vs Parse
Fat Fractal vs Reindex
Fat Fractal vs Graphcool
Around the world in 2024, over 5 companies have started using Fat Fractal as Backend-as-a-Service tool.
Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ponder Source | 20 - 49 | Netherlands | |||
Metakite Software, LLC | 10 - 19 | Fishers | Indiana | United States | |
RELEASE NOTES LLC | 0 - 9 | Dayton | Ohio | United States | |
NJTechWeekly.com | 0 - 9 | Clifton | New Jersey | United States | |
The Website Flip | 0 - 9 | Naperville | Illinois | United States |
The majority of Fat Fractal's customers for the backend-as-a-service category fall in the company size of 0 - 9 employees (3 companies), 10 - 19 employees (1 companies), 20 - 49 employees (1 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of Fat Fractal for backend-as-a-service are the United States with 4(80.00%), Netherlands with 1(20.00%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top Fat Fractal competitors?
Fat Fractal’s Top competitors in the backend-as-a-service category are Vercel, Azure App Service, Backand. You can view a full list of Fat Fractal competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of Fat Fractal and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare Fat Fractal and its feature with top competitors here : Fat Fractal vs Vercel Fat Fractal vs Azure App Service Fat Fractal vs Backand.
What is Fat Fractal customer distribution based on company size?
What is Fat Fractal market share in the backend-as-a-service?
What are the top countries that use Fat Fractal?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo