Categories where Rapid Recovery and OpenText Archiving compete
Rapid Recovery
Comparing the customer bases of Rapid Recovery and OpenText Archiving, we can see that Rapid Recovery has 639 customer(s), while OpenText Archiving has 372 customer(s). In the Data Protection category, with 639 customer(s) Rapid Recovery stands at 7th place by ranking, while OpenText Archiving with 372 customer(s), is at the 12th place.
Rapid Recovery
7th
639 Customer
OpenText Archiving
12th
372 Customer
Rapid Recovery has a 2.02% market share in the Data Protection category, while OpenText Archiving has a 1.18% market share in the same space.
Comparing Rapid Recovery and OpenText Archiving customers based on their geographic location, we can see that Rapid Recovery has more customers in United States, United Kingdom and Australia, while OpenText Archiving has more customers in United States.
Rapid Recovery
OpenText Archiving
Gain actionable insights about the buying patterns of Rapid Recovery vs OpenText Archiving’s target audience.
Rapid Recovery
OpenText Archiving
New
2 Customer
Lost
3 Customer
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
What are the different markets in which Rapid Recovery and OpenText Archiving compete against each other?
Rapid Recovery and OpenText Archiving compete against each other in the Data Protection, Backup, Backup And Recovery, System Administration.
How does the market share of Rapid Recovery and OpenText Archiving compare in the Data Protection market?
How many customers are acquired by Rapid Recovery and OpenText Archiving in the Data Protection segment?
What are the countries in which Rapid Recovery and OpenText Archiving has more customers?
6Sense Chrome Extension
Get free emails, firmographics, technographics, and keyword intent from any website. Qualify leads on the go. Do intelligent outreaches and close deals faster.
Install Now